Sunday 24 July 2016

Film review: The BFG



On Thursday I went to see 'The BFG' at a local cinema, and as I had no Pony Club this weekend (which means a month of no riding - can you feel my pain?) I figured I may as well use the trip as a blog post.

When I was little, I absolutely loved 'The BFG'. I had the book and the DVD (of the 1989 film), the latter of which came with a newspaper that my grandad had bought. It was one of my favourites, so I was a bit apprehensive of seeing a live-action remake. I was aware that throughout the film I was making comparisons from the film I remember fondly to the new, big screen production. I'm just going to go ahead and say it right now that I prefer the old version. It may be a case of I saw the original first (similar to the Monster Inc films - whichever one you watched first is probably going to be your favourite of the two), but there were multiple things that I missed and/or felt critical of in the Spielberg version.

I'll be honest with you, I didn't particularly like Sophie. She came across as too arrogant for my tastes. Yes, it's great that she's strong willed, but the whole scene at the beginning when she's talking to the drunkards just felt very unrealistic. And the orphanage as well; she got away with wondering around in the early hours of morning with no repercussions, which begs the question of what punishments are for if she can collect post at 3am. Furthermore, she never seemed to really show much emotion. Part of this is probably directing, but I am much more accustomed to the girl who is scared but overcomes that, rather than the girl who seems a little arrogant. I don't know, maybe I'm being too picky? Regardless, not liking her definitely made the film a little harder to watch because there didn't seem to be a genuine friendship between Sophie and BFG for much of the film. Whilst her reactions at the Palace were quite funny, it also came across as her being ashamed of him so I didn't really like that too much because they are meant to befriend each other, and care for each other equally.

The CGI and special effects were fantastic though, so that made up for the character disappointment that was Sophie. I loved how the dreams were portrayed, even if I was expecting the cloud-like realm from the original. The reflection of the tree was pretty cool though, and definitely fulfilled the dream-like quality needed. The giants were created brilliantly. Mark Rylance, who played the BFG, was recently on the One Show, and he gave a brief overview of how it all worked in terms of there being a computer version and actual version of the set. All I can say is that the behind-the-camera teams deserve a massive round of applause for some truly stunning work. The make-up teams were fantastic as well. Additionally, credit must go to the script writers for getting the BFG's language so spot on. It's such a fun play on words, and I'm really glad they did it so well (even if it took Sophie way too long to appreciate the BFG's way of speaking).

The element of humour added to the film were very welcome as well. For example, the cat sitting on the bed covers as Sophie walked was amusing in the simplest of ways, and the corgies towards the end were brilliant. It made up for the lack of the creature in the 1989 adaptation - which I cannot remember the name of - who loved Snozzcumber. Much of the breakfast scene was also very good, particularly the giant deciding to spit out the coffee onto three of the people who were serving his breakfast. The comedy was light-hearted to say the least, but it was welcome, especially after the somewhat intense scene involving the other giants invading the BFG's cave. It was also quite fun to have the giants hate the water so much, which made the sudden onset of rain so great earlier on in the film.

Another thing I didn't really like was that there had been previous humans that the BFG had taken. It kind of felt like it undermined his guilt at taking Sophie in some ways. Part of his guilt is that he took her, but it makes it a bit darker to assume that his guilt is primarily based on the fact that his last ward died via giant. Also, surely the giants would be more suspicious if they suddenly smelt a human in Giant Country? Wouldn't it be a case of "who do we know who brings back humans every once in a while to live with him in his cave?". Apart from showing how old the BFG is courtesy of the Queen Victoria picture, it did very little else. I much prefer the first adaptation which had the BFG use the bedding to make a dress for Sophie, rather than the Spielberg version of the BFG handing her the clothes of dead children. Speaking of, I don't think it ever showed the giants in the human world stealing children. On their way isn't really the same thing as seeing them actually taking someone.

Overall, I would recommend the original adaptation of the BFG rather than the current cinema release, but it does come down to a matter of taste and how close you would like the film to be to the book. The currently-in-cinemas film is good, I won't deny that. For an audience who has no prior experience of Giant Country and all that jazz, it is very appealing. In terms of my own, personal preference however, I wouldn't really give it more than 3.5/5 stars. Sorry to those of you who love it, but there were too many flaws for me!

Until next time...

Sunday 17 July 2016

Put Your Best Hoof Forward

Yesterday saw us Pony Club lasses working on our canter leads, with somewhat interesting results. We weren't attempting anything as fancy as flying changes, but I think cantering is one of the gaits where you don't really have to pay attention. It's always beneficial to think about what the horse is doing, and whilst flatwork feels like it will be the death of me, there is seemingly no end to the bonuses of keeping the jumps disassembled.

We started of with a usual warm up just to get the horses listening, but then it was our turn. Our instructor decided that we should play Simon Says. If you did something that 'Simon' didn't say you could, then to the back of the ride you went. One of the things we ended up doing was sitting trot (my equitation went out the window at this point but hey, I stayed in the saddle!) with our left hands on our heads. It felt really weird to have a hand on top of my head. Somehow it made me so much more aware of the bounciness. I think normally your eyes just compensate, but with my hand there this function stopped. Needless to say, I was quite glad when I could both go back into rising trot and also take back the reins with both hands. The other particularly memorable part of the game was having to do around-the-world. Now, I haven't done that since 2008/2009 - when I was learning to ride. I remember it being a lot easier than it is. The bigger you are, the less room there is to manoeuvre in the saddle. Bails was oh so helpful as he decided to start walking when I was facing sideways. He wasn't the only one to do so, and if I was a spectator I would have found it more humorous than I did at the time. Still, I managed to complete the circle and was quite relieved to take the stirrups back.

After that, we got on with learning about canter leads. I knew going into the lesson that the inside front leg is the indicator that you're on the correct lead, but it was only this year or perhaps last year at earliest that I actually learnt this. Horses do tend to pick up the correct lead, and instructors are quick to point out if the transition didn't end with that result, especially if they know the horse in question has difficulty on a certain rein. I was quite happy to canter at the A end of the school, go along the long diagonal, going back to trot around X, and then pick up canter on the other lead because Bails is very sure of himself - he knows what he's doing, so I almost didn't really have to ask too much (except for the whole coming back to trot - then I really had to ask haha),  It also helps that Bails has big strides, so it's really easy to tell if he's on the correct lead.

As me and one of the other girls were familiar with checking the lead, we did a small circuit around the school where we crossed the FH diagonal and then the MK diagonal a couple of times, transitioning down to trot each time we crossed X. The remainder of the group simply went large on one rein and then the other simply to see the inside foreleg coming further forward in order to check the lead. In fairness, the ponies they were on didn't make it easy for them. One was quite small so his legs were flying very quickly, and one of the others kept slowing down so it wasn't as easy for the rider to determine whether she was on the correct leg.

Overall, it was a useful lesson. Sometimes relying on feeling isn't enough, so being able to visually check is a great way of making sure you and the horse are balanced. I definitely can think of a noble steed or two whose wrong diagonal/lead feels like it should be the correct one!

I hope you're all looking forward to the fast approaching summer holidays, and that all of you can find some time to get to the stables.

Until next time...

Sunday 3 July 2016

Period dramas galore

As of late, I've really been getting back into period dramas. I can mostly blame Pinterest for this for showing pictures from scenes of 'Sense and Sensibility' and 'North & South'. I'll admit, I was more interested in the recreation of Austen's work rather than Gaskell's. In fact, I was only led to 'North & South' because I recognised Richard Armitage, who I know from the BBC version of Robin Hood. It's always interesting to see if a character has been type-cast, and I have to say I was happy that he managed to get the girl for once!

Last academic year, I was studying 'The Great Gatsby' and, for my coursework, I had to compare it against a partner text from a given list. One of the texts on this list was 'Pride & Prejudice'. Now, normally I wouldn't go for a book. I definitely had it labelled as a soppy, old book that I felt confident I would dislike, as the only other classic book I had read had not engrossed me as more modern texts of different genres. I am so glad I ignored my own prejudice - if you'll pardon the slight pun - and bought the book because my how it has turned out to be a favourite. It took me a little while to get used to the language (and to be able to find some level of tolerance for Mrs B) but within a few hours I was shipping Jane and Charles, and temporarily hating on Darcy as much as Lizzie. Since reading the book, I have seen the 2005 film (which I strongly recommend watching, especially with the British ending because the extra bit at the end of the American version, I feel, is out of character), watching 'The Lizzie Bennet Diaries' (a must-see YouTube series), Lost in Austen (again, this is well worth a watch), and the BBC series starring Colin Firth (if you like him, then go for it! Not my personal cup of tea though). For those of you familiar with the film, I also strongly recommend searching for 'Darcy's inner struggles' on Pinterest because the results are absolutely hilarious.

It is actually through following various Austen boards on Pinterests and through searches regarding 'Pride & Prejudice' that I came across the other dramas. First up was Sense and Sensibility, which had been sitting on my Netflix watch list for a few weeks. It has not by any means replaced 'Pride & Prejudice' as my favourite Austen work (well... at this point I only know the two!) but it was certainly enjoyable. It is clearly by the same author as 'Pride & Prejudice' from the way in which the encounter between Colonel Brandon and Marianne ended up with her distancing herself and falling for the more sociable, younger and out-going Willoughby, and later finding their way back to each other after finding out that Willoughby had done something despicable. Whilst it may have been predictable, the characters were different and the settings new. I'm definitely going to get a copy of the novel to see whether it is very different in writing.

http://uk.pinterest.com/pin/186266134567309727/
Alongside images from 'Sense and Sensibility' and 'Pride & Prejudice' were pictures from 'North & South' and my goodness is it sad in parts! I think the best description of it came from a blog which said something along the lines of it being similar to a Jane Austen work in terms of romance but without the wit, and like Charles Dickens in its trials but without the broad humour - whilst I am not very familiar with Dickens, from what I know of his novels I agree entirely with assessment this person made. From the outset I knew that Mr Thornton and Miss Hale would end up together, and I could kind of guess which characters were bound to come a cropper given that they were already ill, but there was one that I did not expect until he said that he felt much younger. Even then it was rather sudden. I think I will need to read the book to gain a better understanding of the characters and the contexts etc, but if you are looking for a tall, dark and handsome gent then it's well worth the watch.


The next period drama on my list is 'Daniel Deronda'. I'll let you know what I think of it once I have finished watching it! In the meantime, everything I've mentioned above I'll link below so that you can find it. Sense and Sensibility and North & South are currently on Netflix (UK), as well as the Colin Firth version of Pride and Prejudice if you wanted to watch them on there.


Until next time...

IMDb Lost in Austen                     
BBC Sense and Sensibility            
North & South review